Sunday, 19 January 2020

electromagnetism - Toroid moments tensor decomposition


I am currently working on my bachelor's thesis on the anapole / toroidal moment and it seems that I am stuck with a tensor decomposition problem.


I have actually never had a course about tensors, so I am a complete newbie.


I need to expand a localized current density, which is done by expressing the current via delta distribution and expanding the latter:


j(r,t)=j(ξ,t)δ(ξr)d3ξ δ(ξr)=l=0(1)ll!ξi...ξki...kδ(r)


So I get some result containing the following tensor:


B(l)ij...k(t):=(1)l1(l1)!jiξj...ξkd3ξ



So far, I have understood the math. But now comes the tricky part. In the paper, it says that "we can decompose the tensors B(l)ij...k into irreducible tensors, separating the various multipole moments and radii." and further "...of third rank, B(3)ijk can obviously reduced according to the scheme 1×(2+0)=(3+1)+2+1. It can be seen that the representation of weight l=1 is extracted twice from B(3)ijk." And then follows what seems like the decomposition and I am hopelessly lost.


jiξjξk=13[jiξjξk+jkξiξj+jjξkξi15(δijθk+δikθj+δjkθi)]13(ϵijlμkl+ϵiklμjl) +16(δijλk+δikλj2δjkλi)+15(δijθk+δikθj+δjkθi)


with


μik=μiξk+μkξi , μi=12ϵijkξjjk θi=2ξiξj+ξ2ji λi=ξiξjξ2ji


This decomposition obviously contains many quantities that later on appear also in the multipole expansion, e.g. the magnetic quadrupole moment μik. So on the physics side of things, this makes sense to me.


But not on the mathematical side. On this board I found some questions regarding tensor decomposition and in the answers I learned something about symmetric and antisymmetric tensors and that every tensor can be decomposed in several irreducible ones, which better represent physical properties of the system and symmetries.


But I still, some questions are still there... 1.) What do the numbers 13, 15, etc. mean? Is this some kind of normalization? 2.) How exactly does one decompose the tensor? How can I reconstruct what exactly has been done, which steps one has to follow to decompose it like this?



Answer



This appears to be related to the decomposition of a totally symmetric tensor into traceless parts, which is a fairly involved process. The general equation is \mathcal{C} Q_{a_1 a_2\cdots a_s} = \sum_{k=0}^{[\frac{s}{2}]} (-1)^s \frac{\binom{s}{k} \binom{s}{2k}}{ \binom{2s}{2k}} \delta_{(a_1 a_2} \cdots \delta_{a_{2k-1} a_{2k}} Q_{a_{2k+1}\cdots a_s)}{}^{c_1} {}_{c_1} {}^{c_2}{}_{c_2} {}^{\cdots c_k}{}_{\cdots c_k}, where [\cdot] denotes the integer part, Einstein summation is implied and Q_{(a_1 a_2 \cdots a_s)} \equiv \frac{1}{s!} \sum_{\sigma\in S_s} Q_{a_{\sigma(1)} a_{\sigma(2)} a_{\sigma(3)} \cdots a_{\sigma(s)}}. For the quadrupole moment it is \mathcal{C}Q_{ab} = Q_{ab} - \frac{1}{3} Q^c{}_c \delta_{ab}, for the octupole \mathcal{C}Q_{abc} = Q_{abc} - \frac{1}{5} (Q^d{}_{dc}\delta_{ab} + Q^d{}_{da} \delta_{bc}+ Q^d{}_{db}\delta_{ac}); these yield the factors in your question.


An indication (perhaps proof, although I'm not certain about this at the moment) that the traceless part of a totally symmetric tensor is an irreducible representation is easy to see if one uses the hook formula in dimension 3. A totally symmetric tensor of rank s has \frac{1}{2}(s+1)(s+2) degrees of freedom and the traceless one has the latter minus the number of ways to obtain the traces, \binom{s}{2}, which yields 2s+1. This is the dimension of the irreducible representation of the algebra of SO(3) with spin s. A full proof of this statement is in Maggiore Gravitational waves - theory and experiments.



Reference: F.A.E. Pirani Lectures on General Relativity 1965.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...