In Pauli theory the components of two-component wavefunction were interpreted as probability amplitudes of finding the particle in particular spin state. This seems easy to understand.
But when talking about Dirac equation, we have four-component wavefunction, two of which correspond to usual spin components of Pauli electron, and another two... How do I interpret positron-related components of Dirac electron? Are they probability amplitudes for the particle to appear to be positron? Or maybe to appear to not be positron (taking Dirac sea picture into account)?
Answer
The interpretation of the Dirac equation states depend on what representation you choose for your γμ-matrices or your αi and β-matrices depending on what you prefer. Both are linked via γμ=(β,β→α). Choosing your representation will (more or less) fix your basis in which you consider the solutions to your equation (choosing another representation will rotate your entire solution).
The representation that I will choose is the Dirac-Pauli representation, given by: β=(I2×200−I2×2)andαi=(0σiσi0),
If you would solve the Dirac-equation in this representation, you will find 4 independent solutions: ψ1(x)=N1(10pzE+mpx+ipyE+m)exp(−ipμxμ)
The way to interpret these states is to look at them in the rest-frame, so the frame in which they stand still pμ=(E,0,0,0), the states will become simply the following: ψ1=N1(1000)e−iEt,ψ2=N2(0100)e−iEt,ψ3=N3(0010)eiEt and ψ4=N4(0001)eiEt,
In order to know the spin you should use the helicity-operator, given by: σp=ˆ→p⋅ˆS|→p|,
No comments:
Post a Comment