In Landau & Lifshitz Mechanics, while deriving the properties of Lagrangian of a free particle in inertial frame, he uses the following points :
As space is homogeneous in inertial frame, a particle will follow same law of motion at 10 m from origin as it would follow at 5 m. Since equation of motion is contained in L, hence L should be independent of radius vector \vec{r}.
Similarly, since the L of the particle should behave in the same manner regardless of the time I measure it, it is therefore independent of the current time t.
Now since space is isotropic, L should be independent of velocity \vec{v}, and should in fact be a function of \lvert\vec{v}\rvert^2.
In point 3) I have a problem in conceptually understanding it. For me isotropic means that all directions are the same, so for a given position of a particle, if I measure it from some angle \theta and again at some other angle \phi, then the L obtained in both the cases will be same. But what I think the author is trying to say is that a particle moving in a certain direction given by \vec{v_1} is the same as it's movement in another direction given as \vec{v_2} if \lvert\vec{v_1}\rvert = \lvert\vec{v_2}\rvert
First of all, I don't think it should be same, because I don't think it is equivalent to isotropic of space. Morover if I have to say such a thing about L dependence on \lvert\vec{v}\rvert, then I think I could argue it with homogeneity of space hence not requiring the isotropic principal (again I think isotropic is contained in homogeneity in general).
In a nutshell I want to understand the application of isotropic of space in inferring the \lvert\vec{v}\rvert^2 depedence of L.
Answer
The general idea is that if the laws governing the system are independent on some parameter that may be
distance of experiment from origin r (not \vec r by the way)
time of experiment t
direction of experiment (θ, φ)
then the Lagrangian should be independent on that parameter.
In the case of point 3, that means specifically that L might be any function of the magnitude of the velocity \left| \vec v \right| , but must not depend on the direction of \vec v.
Of course, "any function of \left| \vec v \right|" and "any function of v^2" are mathematically equivalent.
As an aside, any such independence on some parameter implies, per Noether's wonderful theorem, to a conservation law : here 1) momentum, 2) energy, 3) angular momentum.
No comments:
Post a Comment