I am trying to understand how one obtains the Galilean algebra from the Poincare algebra, specifically through the method of central extension. I'm doing this by imposing that the generators of the Poincare group scale with the velocity in certain ways, and then taking the small velocity limit. Also I was told I should make the definition H=M+W,
Answer
In physical, non-covariant language, (WP conventions), the Poincaré algebra presents as [P0,Pi]=0,[Pi,Pj]=0,[Ji,P0]=0 ,[Ki,Pk]=−iδikP0 ,[Ki,P0]=−iPi ,[Km,Kn]=−iϵmnkJk ,[Jm,Pn]=iϵmnkPk ,[Jm,Kn]=iϵmnkKk ,[Jm,Jn]=iϵmnkJk ,
Now redefine the boosts and P0 up and down by the speed of light c, so Ki≡cCi and P0≡1cE.
The Wigner-İnönü contraction c→∞ (slowness!) results in the naive Galilean Lie algebra G(3), [E,Pi]=0,[Pi,Pj]=0,[Li,E]=0,[Ci,Pj]=0 ,[Ci,E]=iPi,[Ci,Cj]=0,[Lm,Ln]=iϵinkLk,[Lm,Pk]=iϵmkjPj,[Lm,Ck]=iϵmkjCj.
In effect, the boost has lost its time-translation piece and is but space translations proportional to the time, Galilean boosts, Ci; and the timelike momentum is a plain time-translation oblivious of c, namely a "hamiltonian", E. The spacelike Pi are generators of translations as before (momentum operators), and Li stand for generators of space rotations, having merely changed name from J, to banish any inapposite thoughts of spin.
Observe how this limit has trivialized several right-hand sides to 0. In fact the 10D regular representation (matrix of structure constants, Gilmore p 220) is a very sparse matrix, indeed. It amounts to extreme structural violence.
Note the quadratic invariants PiPi and LiLi.
The Bargmann central extension algebra is the above, but now with [Ci,Pj]=iMδij instead of the above trivial relation (E/c2→M as c→∞), where the central charge M is an invariant, as the name implies, easy to check consistency of. The quadratic momentum invariant now morphs into a new invariant, ME−P2/2, the mass-shell invariant, and since M is invariant, E−P22M is invariant as well, the potential energy.
E is like the Hamiltonian, but it is not an algebra invariant, as it fails to commute with the Galilean boosts. It is merely a time invariant, i.e. it commutes with itself--pfffft....
No comments:
Post a Comment