Monday, 11 April 2016

homework and exercises - Is curl of a vector a scalar quantity in 2 spatial dimensions? If it is so, then somebody help me understanding Maxwell's equations in 2+1 D


I have seen on wikipedia that in 2 spatial dimensions, Green's theorem, Gauss's divergence and Stokes theorems are equivalent and it makes sense. When I tried to write Maxwell's equations in 2+1 spacetime dimensions, I got many questions and confusions. Here I give a brief summary.


In 3+1 D we have $$\oint_{\bf{A}} {\bf E}\cdot d{\bf A}=\int_V \nabla\cdot\bf {E} dV= \int_V \rho dV.$$ In 2+1D it might be written as $$\oint_\ell {\bf E}\cdot d\bf{\ell}=\int_A \nabla\cdot\bf {E} dA=\int_A \rho dA.$$ $A$ is scalar area in 2+1 D. In 3+1 D $E\cdot dA$ gives the flux. What does ${\bf E}\cdot d\bf{\ell}$ give us?


Secondly in 3+1 D we have $$\oint {\bf E}\cdot d\vec{\ell}=\int_A (\nabla\times\bf {E})\cdot dA=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int_A \bf B\cdot dA. $$ I think it can be written in 2+1 D as $$\oint {\bf E}\cdot d\vec{\ell}=\int_A (\nabla\times\bf {E}) dA=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\int_A B dA,$$ where $B$ is a scalar in 2+1 D and I think the cross product term is also a scalar.


Either I am wrong at writing these expressions or some thing goes messy in 2+1 D. From above expressions we can see that $$\nabla \cdot \bf E = \nabla \times \bf E$$ which is the main prob for me to understand.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...