Wednesday 6 June 2018

spacetime - Does velocity or acceleration cause time dilation?


What causes time dilation? Acceleration or velocity?


I've seen multiple comments on this forum that assert velocity is the cause, but that doesn't seem right to me. You can't have velocity without acceleration. It's the inertial force with acceleration that breaks the symmetry. My understanding is that the asymmetry is where the inertial frame changes. Measuring time between two objects with different inertial frames is where you have time dilation. When the acceleration ends, the object is effectively at rest in a new inertial frame and has velocity relative to another object in the original inertial frame.


In other words, acceleration (changing reference frames) is the cause...velocity and time dilation is the effect.


Am I right about this? If there are flaws in my logic I'd like to find and correct them.



Answer



We need to untangle this a bit but first: the cause of time dilation is the geometry of spacetime which is such that there is an invariant speed c.


Now, remember that velocity or speed is not a property of an object; there is no absolute rest.


Further, consider the case of three objects in uniform relative motion with respect to each other.


If I choose one of those objects and then ask you "what is the relative velocity of this object?", the only proper response you could give is "velocity relative to which of the other objects?"



So, we can't speak of the relative motion of an object but rather the relative motion of a pair of objects.


What we can say is that, for two objects in relative uniform motion with respect to each other, the other object's clock runs slow according to each object's own clock. This is called relative velocity time dilation.


It is important to realize that in the case of relative time dilation, the two relatively and uniformly moving clocks are spatially separated except at one event. Comparing the readings of the two clocks when spatially separated requires additional spatially separated clocks synchronized and stationary in their respective object's frame of reference


But, we find that clocks synchronized in one object's frame are not synchronized in the other relatively moving object's frame. Thus, the relative velocity time dilation is symmetric without contradiction. We can't say that one or the other clock is absolutely running slower.


Now, within the context of Special Relativity, acceleration is absolute, i.e., an object's accelerometer either reads 0 or it doesn't.


And, a fundamental result in SR is that a clock along an accelerated worldline through two events in spacetime records less elapsed time between those events than a clock along an unaccelerated world line through the same two events.


Since, in this case, an accelerated clock and an unaccelerated clock are co-located at two different events, the two clocks can be directly compared and, in this case, the time dilation is absolute - the accelerated clock absolutely shows less elapsed time than the unaccelerated clock.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...