Wednesday, 8 May 2019

quantum mechanics - Time-Energy Uncertainty Relation when $A$ depends explicitly on $t$


There are several questions asking by the meaning of Time-Energy uncertainly relation and also by its derivation.


My problem is about the second. In all documents I have seen, the same is supposed alwas: Let $A$ an observable which does not depend explictly on $t$. (from John Baez's web page to Griffiths (p.113) and also in the original paper, formula 4). Then


$$\Delta T_A \Delta H \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} . $$


My question is: What happens if we allow $\langle \partial A/ \partial t \rangle \neq 0$?.


EDIT.


@ZoltanZimboras demands me to write the definition of $\Delta T_A$. The truth is I'm not sure how to answer him. Usually, $\Delta T_A$ is defined as



$$ \Delta T_A = \frac{\langle A \rangle}{\frac{d\langle A\rangle}{dt}}. $$


If we set the same definition, then the Heisenberg's inequality comes


$$\Delta T_A \Delta H \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\left| 1-\frac{\langle\partial A/\partial t\rangle}{d\langle A\rangle /dt } \right|. $$


The advantage of this definition is physics understand very well the meaning of the quantity $\Delta T_A$, but then the above equation comes more difficult. On the other hand, if we set


$$\Delta T_A = \frac{\langle A \rangle}{\frac{d\langle A\rangle}{dt}-\left\langle \frac{\partial A}{\partial t}\right\rangle}, $$


Then the Heisenberg's principle takes its usual form, but we have to reinterpret the quantity $\Delta T_A$.



Answer



Following the argument in Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths, $$\Delta H\Delta Q=\frac{1}{2i}\langle [H,Q]\rangle=\frac{\hbar}{2}\left|\frac{d\langle Q\rangle}{dt}-\left\langle\frac{\partial Q}{\partial t}\right\rangle\right|$$


Then, defining $\Delta E=\Delta H$, $$\left|\frac{d\langle Q\rangle}{dt}-\left\langle\frac{\partial Q}{\partial t}\right\rangle\right|\Delta t \equiv \Delta Q$$ Your first equation after the edit is what $\Delta t$ is defined as in the absence of explicit time dependence of $Q$. As for the interpretation of this new definition, it is the amount of time it takes for the expectation value of $Q$ to move a standard deviation away from the expectation value of its change. Informally, it is a measure of how quickly this operator will "misbehave" in the sense of how far its "average" value is from what one would expect just from the operator's changes.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...