Thursday, 22 August 2019

special relativity - Why do we write the lengths in the following way? Question about Lorentz transformation


Yesterday we have studied the Lorentz transformation in school. So we have two frames of reference, $S$ and $S'$ . $S$ is stationary and $S'$. $S'$ has a constant velocity $v$, relative to the $S$ frame. $v$ is directed along the Ox axis. Ox is parallel to Ox' and Oy is parallel to Oy'.


If we apply the Galilran Transformations we get:


$x = x' + ut' $ $y = y'$ $z = z'$ $t = t'$


$ x' = x - ut $ $y'=y$ $z'=z$ $t' = t$


Now, our physics teacher, assumed that:


$ x=k(x'+ut')$ $ x'=k(x-ut)$ with k being a constant.


Why did he do that? I didn't understand. I undrstood that the length of an object depends o the frame of reference and that the speed of light is the same in the two frames.


Assuming the above facts, we can derive the $k$ constant:$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}$$



But why did we make that first assumptikn? I didn't get the logic. Could somebody explain, please?




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...