Yesterday we have studied the Lorentz transformation in school. So we have two frames of reference, S and S′ . S is stationary and S′. S′ has a constant velocity v, relative to the S frame. v is directed along the Ox axis. Ox is parallel to Ox' and Oy is parallel to Oy'.
If we apply the Galilran Transformations we get:
x=x′+ut′ y=y′ z=z′ t=t′
x′=x−ut y′=y z′=z t′=t
Now, our physics teacher, assumed that:
x=k(x′+ut′) x′=k(x−ut) with k being a constant.
Why did he do that? I didn't understand. I undrstood that the length of an object depends o the frame of reference and that the speed of light is the same in the two frames.
Assuming the above facts, we can derive the k constant:1√1−u2c2
But why did we make that first assumptikn? I didn't get the logic. Could somebody explain, please?
No comments:
Post a Comment