Comparing the work required for a mass to escape the Earth's gravity to the necessary initial kinetic energy gives us the escape velocity from the surface of the Earth of around 11km⋅s−1.
But assuming no air friction and hence no loss in energy on the axis perpendicular to gravity it shouldn't matter what angle the projectile is projected at.
Is this true?
If there were no air and we fired a projectile at 1∘ to the horizontal at a velocity of 11km⋅s−1 should it still escape the Earth's gravity despite such a low ( 11000sin(01∘)m⋅s−1) vertical velocity?
Could it be that firing a projectile horizontally at the escape velocity in a frictionless medium would result in a perfect orbit?
Also: Taking escape velocity of 11200m⋅s−1 and radius af Earth of 6371000m and g=9.80665m⋅s−2. On a flat Earth if you fired an object horizontally at 112000m⋅s−1 it would fall 0.039m after 1000m. But using trigonometry the Earth would have curved away by 0.078m. Twice the value necessary for an orbit. Can someone check this?
Answer
Essentially, yes. The derivation of the escape velocity is based only on the energy balance and energy does not depend on the direction. This follows from the property of the gravitational field to be conservative, so work required to move between any 2 points is independent from the path you take.
Vague intuition: the vertical speed you estimate is about 60ms which would be nullified by the gravitational acceleration in ∼6s. But in the meantime the ship would move horizontally by almost 65km which is far over the horizon. There the acceleration would be more collinear with the velocity of the ship, so it will have much easier time to escape.
In search of inspiration, I found this instructive online simulation
Regarding your second question about the orbit. Actually, no the escape velocity will result in escape. To get to the lowest possible orbit (at a distance ∼6400km from the center, you need only 7.9kms and increasing speed will result in a higher elliptical orbit.
No comments:
Post a Comment