l just read about wormholes and blackholes. They're simply hypothetical structures in the universe predicted by physicists. My question is, what is the basis of their prediction? Who are the people who just wakes up one day and predicts "there is a hole that sucks all of matter and light into it" and "there is an alternate universe once we travel through this tunnel called the wormhole". It seems too random and frivolous to me, because I can wake up one day and speculate the existence of something weird too. I am no expert in such abstract physics (Heck, I'm still applying for college). Any qualitative or quantitative explanation would be of much help. Thank you!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid
What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...
-
Why can't we use fissions products for electricity production ? As far has I know fissions products from current nuclear power plants cr...
-
A rook stands in the lower left corner of an $m\times n$ chessboard. Alice and Bob alternately move the rook (horizontally or vertically, th...
-
Recently I was going through "Problems in General physics" by I E Irodov. In Electromagnetics chapter, there is a question how muc...
-
Yesterday, I understood what it means to say that the moon is constantly falling (from a lecture by Richard Feynman ). In the picture below ...
-
I am having trouble understanding how centripetal force works intuitively. This is my claim. When I have a mass strapped on a string and spi...
-
Work done is defined as the dot product of force and displacement. However, intuitively, should it not be the product of force and the time...
-
What shape does the viewer in a reference frame with $v=0$ perceive? I suppose that since the sphere moves in one direction only (oX only, n...
No comments:
Post a Comment