My QFT knowledge has very much rusted and i got confused by these few lines from Peskin and Schroeder:
p.27: " [..] the amplitude for a particle to propagate from y to x is ⟨0|ϕ(x)ϕ(y)|0⟩. We will call this quantity D(x—y)."
(The relation with the commutator is explicitly calculated at (2.53) p.28, + bottom of p.29: [ϕ(x),ϕ(y)]=⋯=D(x−y)−D(y−x)=⟨0|[ϕ(x),ϕ(y)]|0⟩
Finally the expressions of the retarded and Feynman propagators are given (2.55) p.30
DR:=θ(x0−y0)⟨0|[ϕ(x),ϕ(y)]|0⟩
and (2.60) p.31 (without commutators)
DF:=θ(x0−y0)⟨0|ϕ(x)⋅ϕ(y)|0⟩+θ(y0−x0)⟨0|ϕ(y)⋅ϕ(x)|0⟩
which by definition of "propagator" or "Green's function" satisfy (◻+m2)G(x,y)=−iδ4(x−y).
Now my confusion comes from the fact that I remember that propagators had the interpretation of the amplitude of propagation, cf. e.g. wikipedia or Peskin last 2 lines p.82, but this is wrong? (three different functions obviously cannot have the exact same interpretation!)
Remark: I am aware that from the defining relation of a Green's function, one can express the "evolution" of a solution of the (Klein-Gordon) equation, so that in some sense propagators expresses an idea of propagation
The first question is too easy so here is a second: Are propagators always combinations of the D(x−y)?
- for interacting fields
- for more general PDE?
Remark: I'm not trying to relate interacting theories to the free one, so D(x−y) stands for the amplitude of propagation in each theory not the free one. The underlying idea is that D(x−y) has a clear interpretation while the propagators would not have an easy interpretation on their own unless they are just simple functions of these D(x−y).
No comments:
Post a Comment