A climber wants to know the depth of a well. He drops a rock and 4 seconds later he hears a noise. The speed of sound is 340 m/s.
Okay, so
t=4s
But t has 2 parts,
t=t1+t2
Because there is a time when the object is hitting the bottom of the well, and then another time which is sound going back to his ear.
I used formula:
Δx=Voxt+(1/2)axt2
to get height in terms of t1,
So he dropped the object from the top, its initial velocity = 0
thus I'm left with
Ht1=(1/2)(9.8m/s2)(t21)
Ht1=(4.9m/s2)(t21)
Then I set up another equation for height. The reason I'm doing this is to set my two height equations = to each other and isolate my t1 variable because I need it to complete my problem
The reason I used 1360m - 340 m/s * t1 is because 4 seconds times 340 m/s is = to 1360, and im subtracting one of the times multiplied by the speed of sound to get the height of the well.
Ht2=1360m−(340m/s×t1)
Okay so here is my first question:
Is everything that I'm doing right now making sense? I'm not asking if this is the most efficient way to do it, I'm asking is my method right now sound, because this is what I would do on a test...
Anyways, I set the equations =
t1=4s−t2
(4.9m/s2)(4s−t2)2=1360m−(340m/s×t1)
(4.9m/s2)×(16s2−8s(t2)+(t2)2) = 1360m−(340m/s×t1)
78m−39ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2=1360m−(340m/s×t1)
1360m−(340m/s×t1)=78m−39ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2
1360m−(340ms×(4s−t2))=78m−39ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2
1360m−(1360m−340mst2)=78m−39ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2
−340mst2=78m−39ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2
0=78m+301ms(t2)+4.9ms2(t2)2
using quadratic equation I solve and get t2=−.26, but I use the absolute value here and get t2=.26
Now I find that t1=3.74seconds
and use Vx=axt because initial velocity was zero and getVx=36.7
now finally to get height I use Δx=(1/2)(Vx)t again Vox = 0 so I don't count it and get
heightofwell=68.6meters
What did I do wrong though? Does my method seem sound for everyone reading? I think I did this problem perfectly fine but according to:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110220154829AAH4NvU
the answer is 70.48 m.
Did maybe I just have a calculation error but my method was correct? On a test do you think a teacher would still give me credit if I was only off by 1.88 meters? Can anyone please help because this problem is driving me crazy.
No comments:
Post a Comment