Saturday 21 July 2018

quantum field theory - Gauge fermions versus gauge bosons


Why are all the interactions particle of a gauge theory bosons. Are fermionic gauge particle fields somehow forbidden by the theory ?



Answer



The reason that the gauge particle must be a spin 1 gauge boson is because there aren't any renormalizable alternatives. To see this consider the Dirac Lagrangian:


\begin{equation} \bar{\psi} i \gamma ^\mu \partial _\mu \psi \end{equation} This term is not gauge invariant under the transformation, $ \psi \rightarrow e ^{ i T ^a \theta ^a (x) } \psi $, because of the derivative spoils the desired transformation of $ \partial _\mu \psi $. To fix this we must add a contribution that transforms in the same way as the derivative, i.e., transforms as a vector. In other words we modify the derivative such that, \begin{equation} D _\mu \psi \rightarrow e ^{ i T _a \theta _a (x) } D _\mu \psi \end{equation}



The question is what to add to $ D _\mu $. We can potentially add spin $ 0, \frac{1}{2} , 1 , \frac{3}{2} , $ and $ 2 $ particles to fix this. We go case by case.


There is no combination of spin zero fields that transform as a vector without adding derivatives (adding derivative to fix the derivative covariance would take you in circles), thus we can't have a spin zero gauge boson.


Next consider adding a spin $ 1/2 $ gauge boson we could write ($ \psi _a $ is a gauge particle, not $ \psi $), \begin{equation} D _\mu = \partial _\mu + \sum _a T ^a \left( g\bar{\psi} ^a \gamma _\mu \psi ^a + g ' \bar{\psi} ^a \gamma _\mu \gamma ^5 \psi ^a \right) \end{equation} However, this would give an interaction \begin{equation} \sum _a i\left[ \bar{\psi} \gamma ^\mu\psi \right] \left[ \bar{\psi} _a \gamma _\mu \psi _a \right] \end{equation} and similarly for the $ \gamma ^5 $ term. These interactions are non-renormalizable as they involve four fermions. Non-renormalizable interactions arise from effective field theories and are suppressed by the scale at which they arise. This would make the gauge interactions non-fundamental but instead involve a massive vector particle integrated out. For the integrated out interaction to be renormalizable it must be between two fermions and a spin $1$ field. This brings us back to the usual case.


The spin $1$ field works well and exists in the SM. I'm not sure about the spin $ 3/2 $ field as I have no experience with working with such fields however, I presume it won't work for similar reasons. I also know that spin $2$ fields must mediate gravitational fields and thus would give a nonsensible result.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...