Friday, 27 July 2018

special relativity - Minkowski spacetime: Is there a signature (+,+,+,+)?


In history there was an attempt to reach (+, +, +, +) by replacing "ct" with "ict", still employed today in form of the "Wick rotation". Wick rotation supposes that time is imaginary. I wonder if there is another way without need to have recourse to imaginary numbers.



Minkowski spacetime is based on the signature (-, +, +, +). In a Minkowski diagram we get the equation: $$ \delta t^2 - \delta x^2 = \tau^2 $$ Tau being the invariant spacetime interval or the proper time.


By replacing time with proper time on the y-axis of the Minkowski diagram, the equation would be $$ \delta x^2 + \tau^2 = \delta t^2$$ In my new diagram this equation would describe a right-angled triangle, and the signature of (proper time, space, space, space) would be (+, +, +, +).


enter image description here


I am aware of the fact that the signature (-, +, +, +) is necessary for the majority of physical calculations and applications (especially Lorentz transforms), and thus the (+, +, +, +) signature would absolutely not be practicable.( Edit: In contrast to some authors on the website about Euclidian spacetime mentioned in alemi’s comment below)


But I wonder if there are some few physical calculations/ applications where this signature is useful in physics (especially when studying the nature of time and of proper time).


Edit (drawing added): Both diagrams (time/space and proper time/space) are observer's views, even if, as it has been pointed out by John Rennie, dt is frame dependent and τ is not.



Answer



The significance of the metric:


$$ d\tau^2 = dt^2 - dx^2 $$


is that $d\tau^2$ is an invarient i.e. every observer in every frame, even accelerated frames, will agree on the value of $d\tau^2$. In contrast $dt$ and $dx$ are coordinate dependant and different observers will disagree about the relative values of $dt$ and $dx$.



So while it is certainly true that:


$$ dt^2 = d\tau^2 + dx^2 $$


this is not (usually) a useful equation because $dt^2$ is frame dependant.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...