Sunday 24 November 2019

statistical mechanics - Partition function of lattice without kinetic energy


Consider a single particle on a cubic lattice with $N$ sites each with a site length of $a$. The particle has no kinetic energy but only feels a spatially varying continuous potential $v(\boldsymbol{r})$.


One can directly write down the partition function as sum over possible states (particle at different sites):


$$Z=\sum_i^N\mathrm{e}^{-\beta v(\boldsymbol{r_i})}$$


But what happens if we want to evaluate the partition function from the continuous representation, i.e.


$$Z=\frac{1}{h^3}\left(\int \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{p}\right)\left(\int \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{r} \mathrm{e}^{-\beta v(\boldsymbol{r})}\right)=\frac{1}{h^3}\left(\int \mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{p}\right)a^3\sum_i^N \mathrm{e}^{-\beta v(\boldsymbol{r_i})}$$


Does that mean that $\frac{a^3}{h^3}\int\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{p} = 1$?





Edit: As suggested by AccidentalFourierTransform we could integrate over the first Brilloin zone, this would exactly be in agreement with the above statement:


$\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{p} = \hbar^3\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{k} = \hbar^3\int\limits_{-\pi/a}^{\pi/a}\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{k} = \frac{h^3}{a^3}$


Could someone comment on that or give an explanation? Is this a valid approach? Can e.g. atoms sitting on the lattice sites be considered as waves? And why do we not need to integrate over higher momenta as the Brilloin zone?




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...