Thursday 25 December 2014

Understanding scattering cross section


I think I might have a serious misunderstanding of some concepts to do with scattering cross sections and would really appreciate any help.



As far as I can tell the differential cross section is basically a measure of what fraction of particles get scattered into some solid angle. To get the total cross section all we need to do is then integrate over all solid angles. However I can't determine why this wouldn't just be equal to 1 i.e. that we are guaranteed to find the scattered particle at some solid angle. An attempt in my mind to fix this would be to not include the infinitesimal on axis solid angle. However, unless the differential cross section was infinite their, it wouldn't make any difference.


Could anyone tell me what's gone wrong with my reasoning? Much appreciated!



Answer



Scattering cross sections can have other parameters besides angle. For example you commonly have cross sections vs. angle and final energy, $d\sigma/d\Omega\, dE_\text{final}$. This might reflect the fact that in a generic elastic scattering process forward-scattered particles tend to retain most of the beam energy, while backwards-scattered particles must deposit a lot of energy and momentum in the target.


If you're doing purely elastic scattering from a crystal, for example Bragg scattering, the cross section $d\sigma/d\Omega$ will essentially vanish except for some very particular angles. It's the values of those magic angles that are useful, and the relative strengths of scattering at one angle versus another. The fact that the entire incident beam has to go somewhere can sometimes be a useful check, but more often the unscattered / forward-scattered beam gets sent to some beam dump and ignored.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...