We are given that
tre−iℏˆHt=∫D[a1,…,an]×exp[∫t0dt′(12∑j(aj(t′)−a∗j(t′))(˙aj(t′)−˙a∗j(t′))−iℏH(a1(t′),a2(t′),…,a∗1(t′),a∗2(t′)…))].
and asked to write down the path integral for tre−iℏˆHt for the many particle Hamiltonian ˆH=∑i,jh(i,j)a†iaj+12∑i,jUint(i,j)a†ia†jajai.
I cannot see the connection between these two expressions, particularly with respect to the ai,a†i's and the aj(t′),a∗j(t′)'s
I cannot see how to make the connection between these two expressions taken as a total. I cannot see the justification for just swapping them directly and it seems like there is more to this.
Answer
I can give an outline of the arguments that show how to arrive at the path integral representation of the expression tre−iˆHt. For simplicity I set ℏ=1 and only consider the 1-particle case. The multi-particle case is technically more demanding but conceptionally the same. So the Hamiltonian I consider is simply ˆH=ha†a+Ua†a†aa.
The first step is to see that there is an overcomplete set of eigenstates of the annihilation operators a called the Coherent States |α⟩. They satisfy a|α⟩=α|α⟩andI=1π∫dα|α⟩⟨α| where α is a complex number and the integral is over all complex values for α. Another crucial property is the scalar product ⟨β|α⟩=e−12(|β|2+|α|2−2β∗α).
Given these eigenstates of the annihilation operators, we can perform the usual steps in finding a path integral representation of a transition amplitude: tre−iˆHt=1π∫dα1⟨α1|e−iˆHt|α1⟩=1πN∫dα1…dαN⟨α1|e−iˆHtN|α2⟩⟨α2|e−iˆHtN|α3⟩⟨α3|…|αN⟩⟨αN|e−iˆHtN|α1⟩ where we have introduced N sets of full sets of eigenstates at intermediate times dividing the time t into N segments. In the end, we will want to take the limit of N→∞.
Now come the step where the operators a and a† vanish. They are just replaced by numbers as they are evaluated on the inserted eigenstates. Note that a|α⟩=α|α⟩ implies ⟨α|a†=⟨α|α∗. Therefore, ⟨α1|e−iˆHtN|α2⟩=⟨α1|e−itN(ha†a+Ua†a†aa)|α2⟩=⟨α1|α2⟩e−itN(hα∗1α2+Uα∗1α∗1α2α2)
⟨α1|α2⟩ can be written according to the scalar product given above. In the limit N→∞ one writes lim The discrete \alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_N become a function, which we call a(t). The scalar products \langle\alpha_{i}|\alpha_{i+1}\rangle, that appear from each of the inserted sets of eigenstates gives rise to the first line in your expression for the path integral. The remaining exponential expressions just give the Hamiltonian, but now simply as a function of a(t) rather than an operator expression.
No comments:
Post a Comment