An electrostatic potential associated with some delocalized charge ∫ρ(r)dr is given by:
vH(r)=∫ρ(r′)|r−r′|dr′
This potential is finite at r=0. Since 1|r−r′| is a solution to a singular Poisson's equation, we can show that:
∇2vH(r)=−4πρ(r) where ρ is a smooth function being finite everywhere.
Would a function
v(r)=∫ρ(r′)|r−r′|ndr′
(where n is some nonnegative integer)
be also finite at r=0?
In this case, 1|r−r′|n does not represent a solution to Poisson's equation (r∈R3) and the above analysis is not valid.
Answer
Maybe too simple, and certainly not a general solution, but anyway here goes.
The simplest case is a spherical charge distribution:
ρ={ρ0r≤a0r>a Then
V(0)=ρ0∫a04πr2rndr=4πρ0∫a0r2−ndr
Cases:
$$ 0
n=3V(0)=4πρ0lim
n>3 \qquad V(0) = \frac{4 \pi \rho_0}{n-3} \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \left(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{n-3}} - \frac{1}{a^{n-3}} \right) \rightarrow \infty
In all these cases, the denominator of the original integral, |r-r'|^n, grows without bound for large r, and the charge is localized around the origin, so
\lim_{r \rightarrow \infty} V(r) =0
So, n=3 divides the finite from the infinite cases. (Technically, I suppose this calc constitutes a counter-example for n \ge 3 by exhibiting an unbounded result for those cases).
No comments:
Post a Comment