Sunday, 3 December 2017

thermodynamics - Is there a way to split a black hole?



Classically, black holes can merge, becoming a single black hole with an horizon area greater than the sum of both merged components.


Is it thermodynamically / statistically possible to split a black hole in multiple black holes? If the sum of the areas of the product black holes would exceed the area of the original black hole, it seems to be a statistically favorable transition by the fact alone that would be a state with larger entropy than the initial state



Answer



I) Let us choose units where c=1=G for simplicity. Recall that a Kerr-Newman black-hole with mass M>0, charge Q[M,M], and angular momentum J0, has surface area given by


A4π := r2++a2 = M2+δ+2MΔ,


where


r+ := M+Δ,Δ := δa2  0,δ := M2Q2  0,a := JM.


The entropy


S = kB2PA4


is proportional to the area A.



II) An interesting question asks the following.



If we merge n Kerr-Newman black-holes
(Mi>0,Qi,Ji),i{1,,n}, into one Kerr-Newman black-hole (M>0,Q,J), such that mass and charge are conserved1 M = iMi,Q = iQi,J  iJi, and the angular momentum satisfies the triangle inequality; would the discriminant Δ  0 for the merged black hole be non-negative, and would the Kerr-Newman area formula (1) respect the second law of thermodynamics A > iAi ?



The answer is in both cases Yes! The ineq. (7) in turn shows that the opposite splitting process is impossible, cf. OP's question.


Proof of ineqs. (6) & (7): First note that


δ (2)= (M+Q)(MQ) (5)= i(Mi+Qi)(MiQi)+ij(Mi+Qi)(MjQj)  (2) i(Mi+Qi)(MiQi) (2)= iδi,


and hence


δ2 (8) δi+δj2  δiδj,



due to the ineq. of arithmetic & geometric means. Next consider


M2Δ(iMiΔi)2 (2)= (M2δJ2)iM2iΔiijMiΔiMjΔj  (2)+(5) (δiM2i+δijMiMjJ2)i(M2iδiJ2i)ijMiδiMjδj  (8)+(9) ijMiδiMjδj+iJ2iJ2 (2) ijJiJj+iJ2iJ2  = (iJi)2J2 (5) 0.


Ineq. (10) implies ineq. (6) and


MΔ (10) iMiΔi.


Together with


M2 > iM2i,


eqs. (8) & (11) yield ineq. (7).


--


1 We assume that the system can be treated as isolated. In particular, we ignore outgoing gravitational radiation. As we know from recent gravitational wave detections, this assumption is violated in practice for black hole merges. However, for the opposite hypothetical splitting process, which OP asks about, this is a reasonable assumption.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...