There is an object in the universe for which the Sun appears to be more stationary as it travels through the universe than a star on some other system. There is probably another object for which both our sun and the 2nd star (combined) appear to be more stationary. Does there exist in an object in the universe for which all objects appear to be the most stationary (on average)? What about an object that makes all other objects appear to be the least stationary? Would identifying this object have any significance at all or is it just a random rock somewhere in space that has some coordinates that will fail to offer additional insight? Wouldn't this object experience the least amount of time dilation (i.e. everything else is in slow motion with respect to this object)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Why can't we use fissions products for electricity production ? As far has I know fissions products from current nuclear power plants cr...
-
A rook stands in the lower left corner of an $m\times n$ chessboard. Alice and Bob alternately move the rook (horizontally or vertically, th...
-
Recently I was going through "Problems in General physics" by I E Irodov. In Electromagnetics chapter, there is a question how muc...
-
Yesterday, I understood what it means to say that the moon is constantly falling (from a lecture by Richard Feynman ). In the picture below ...
-
I am having trouble understanding how centripetal force works intuitively. This is my claim. When I have a mass strapped on a string and spi...
-
Work done is defined as the dot product of force and displacement. However, intuitively, should it not be the product of force and the time...
-
What shape does the viewer in a reference frame with $v=0$ perceive? I suppose that since the sphere moves in one direction only (oX only, n...
No comments:
Post a Comment