Saturday, 21 December 2019

quantum mechanics - Finite Square Well Inside an Infinite Square Well


Ok here's a potential I invented and am trying to solve:


$$ V(x) = \begin{cases} -V_0&0a \\ \end{cases}$$


and V(x)=V(x) (Even potential)


I solved it twice and I got the same nonsensical transcendental equation for the allowed energies:
kz0k2e2kb+e2kae2kbe2ka=tan(bz0k2).


, where k=2mE/ and z0=2mV0/2


The problem is that when I take the limit as ba (the ordinary infinite square well) I get a division by 0.



So is there something fundamentally wrong with trying to solve this potential? Is it wrong to have an Infinite potential and bury some of it under the 0 (negative potential) ? Note: I am solving it for negative energies (bound bound states?).


EDIT by CZ, for readability and analytic continuation of l.h.side, cf. Gilbert et al.: kz0k2coth(k(ba)) .



Answer



The potential you have written is perfectly legitimate, let's do the derivation from scratch: $$ V(x) = \begin{cases} -V_0&0a \\ \end{cases}$$


and V(x)=V(x) the Hamiltonian will commute with the parity operator [ˆH,ˆP]=0, therefore the eigenstates of the energy will be eigenstates of the parity operator too. Also, we can solve the problem in the interval [0,a] with $b0(youcaneasilycheckthatifyoustartedfromtheconditiontogettheboundstatesinsidethefinitewellyouwouldgetanimpossibleconditionfortheinfiniteoneatthepointx=a$)


Region [0,b]:


The Shrodinger equation is 22m2ψV0ψ=Eψ

with V0>0 in one dimension the solution will be: ψ+(x)=C1cos(ωx)ψ(x)=C1sin(ωx)
we will work with parity +. for comodity. With ω=2m2(V0+E).


Region [b,a]:


Here the Shrodinger equation is: 22m2ϕ=Eϕϕ(a)=0

notice that ϕ(a)=0 is the foundamental condition that "tells" the particle that there is an infinite well, and this condition is also the reason that E>0 infact if E<0 you would have ϕ+=A1cosh(kx) which only has immaginary solutions for ϕ(a)=0 or the useless k=0. The solution for E>0 here will be: ϕ+(x)=A1cos(kx)ϕ(x)=A1sin(kx)
with k=2m2E, now since ϕ±(a)=0 we have that k must be: k+=(2n+1)π2ak=nπa
.


Now we have to match the solutions in x=b. (we have to match the derivatives too since the general solution must be C2)



ψ+(b)=ϕ+(b)ψ+(b)=ϕ+(b)

this leads to (for the parity even eigenstates):


C1cos(ωb)=A1cos(kb)C1ωsin(ωb)=A1ksin(kb)

The solution reads: tan(ωb)=kωtan(kb)
which can be written as : ωtan(ωb)=(2n+1)π2atan(2n+12aπb)


Now, if you do ba you get that tan(2n+12π) which means that cos(ωb)=0 which means that ω=2n+12bπ (also k vanishes) which is the usual energy for the infinite well.


The limit b0 is consistent too. Consider equation (1) written as ω=ktan(kb)tan(ωb)

now take the limit b0 on both sides  ω=kkωω=k
and you are left with k=(2n+1)π2a which is the usual infinite well energy.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...