Ok here's a potential I invented and am trying to solve:
$$ V(x) = \begin{cases} -V_0&0
and V(−x)=V(x) (Even potential)
I solved it twice and I got the same nonsensical transcendental equation for the allowed energies:
−k√z0−k2e2kb+e2kae2kb−e2ka=tan(b√z0−k2).
, where k=√−2mE/ℏ and z0=2mV0/ℏ2
The problem is that when I take the limit as b→a (the ordinary infinite square well) I get a division by 0.
So is there something fundamentally wrong with trying to solve this potential? Is it wrong to have an Infinite potential and bury some of it under the 0 (negative potential) ? Note: I am solving it for negative energies (bound bound states?).
EDIT by CZ, for readability and analytic continuation of l.h.side, cf. Gilbert et al.: −k√z0−k2coth(k(b−a)) .
Answer
The potential you have written is perfectly legitimate, let's do the derivation from scratch: $$ V(x) = \begin{cases} -V_0&0
and V(−x)=V(x) the Hamiltonian will commute with the parity operator [ˆH,ˆP]=0, therefore the eigenstates of the energy will be eigenstates of the parity operator too. Also, we can solve the problem in the interval [0,a] with $b0(youcaneasilycheckthatifyoustartedfromtheconditiontogettheboundstatesinsidethefinitewellyouwouldgetanimpossibleconditionfortheinfiniteoneatthepointx=a$)
Region [0,b]:
The Shrodinger equation is −ℏ22m∇2ψ−V0ψ=Eψ with V0>0 in one dimension the solution will be: ψ+(x)=C1cos(ωx)ψ−(x)=C1sin(ωx) we will work with parity +. for comodity. With ω=√2mℏ2(V0+E).
Region [b,a]:
Here the Shrodinger equation is: ℏ22m∇2ϕ=Eϕϕ(a)=0 notice that ϕ(a)=0 is the foundamental condition that "tells" the particle that there is an infinite well, and this condition is also the reason that E>0 infact if E<0 you would have ϕ+=A1cosh(kx) which only has immaginary solutions for ϕ(a)=0 or the useless k=0. The solution for E>0 here will be: ϕ+(x)=A1cos(kx)ϕ−(x)=A1sin(kx) with k=√2mℏ2E, now since ϕ±(a)=0 we have that k must be: k+=(2n+1)π2ak−=nπa.
Now we have to match the solutions in x=b. (we have to match the derivatives too since the general solution must be C2)
ψ+(b)=ϕ+(b)ψ′+(b)=ϕ′+(b) this leads to (for the parity even eigenstates):
C1cos(ωb)=A1cos(kb)C1ωsin(ωb)=A1ksin(kb) The solution reads: tan(ωb)=kωtan(kb) which can be written as : ωtan(ωb)=(2n+1)π2atan(2n+12aπb)
Now, if you do b→a you get that tan(2n+12π)→∞ which means that cos(ωb)=0 which means that ω=2n+12bπ (also k vanishes) which is the usual energy for the infinite well.
The limit b→0 is consistent too. Consider equation (1) written as ω=ktan(kb)tan(ωb) now take the limit b→0 on both sides ω=k⋅kω⟶ω=k and you are left with k=(2n+1)π2a which is the usual infinite well energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment