Friday, 12 September 2014

quantum mechanics - Are there any non-interpretational arguments in favour of Everett's Many-Worlds?


As far as I understand Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation, he makes the case for a realist theory of QM at the enormous cost of many-worlds.



Are there any arguments in favour of Everett's interpretation that makes the case for his theory one a purely instrumental or operational view - in that certain calculation look easier or more 'elegant'?




No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...