Saturday 29 November 2014

quantum mechanics - Supercharges for N=1 supersymmetry of a super Hamiltonian


I currently have determined a super Hamiltonian for a non-relativistic electron in an external electromagnetic field using an appropriate Lagrangian and use of the Euler-Lagrange equations:


$$H=\frac{1}{2m}\left(\overrightarrow{p}-\frac{q}{c}\overrightarrow{A}\right)^2+q\phi$$



I then considered an electron in a purely magnetic field finding that there is an additional interaction such that


$$H=\frac{1}{2m}\left(\overrightarrow{p}+\frac{q}{c}\overrightarrow{A}\right)^2+\frac{g}{2}\frac{e\hbar}{2mC}\overrightarrow{B}\cdot{\overrightarrow{\sigma}}.$$


By setting $g=2$ I can analyse the Hamiltonian in $\mathcal N=1$ supersymmetry by considering the anti-commutation relations between supercharges and the Hamiltonian:


$$H=2Q_i^2=\{Q_i,Q_i\}$$


where $[H,Q_i]=0$. My struggle is that this closely follows the Fred Cooper book on Supersymmetric Quantum mechanics and he achieves a supercharge as shown below


$$Q_i=\frac{1}{\sqrt{4m}}\left(\overrightarrow{p}+\frac{e}{c}\overrightarrow{A}\right)\cdot{\overrightarrow{\sigma}}.$$


I am lost as to how this is found by simple factorisation. I am unsure, how is this done?



Answer



If you are unsure of how to verify it, start with $$Q^2=(p+A)^i\sigma_i\,(p+A)^j\sigma_j,$$ where I'm summing over both indices and I'm getting rid of the constants for simplicity. This splits into a term where both $p$ are acting on the wavefunction, and a term where the left $p$ is acting on the right $A$. $$=(p+A)^i(p+A)^j\sigma_i\sigma_j-i\partial^iA^j \sigma_i\sigma_j$$ Now use the identity $\sigma_i\sigma_j=\delta_{ij}+i\epsilon_{ijk}\sigma_k.$ The first term in $Q^2$ is symmetric in $i,j$ so only the Kronecker delta matters, in the second term the Kronecker delta leads to the divergence of $A$ which vanishes in the Coulomb gauge, so only the Levi-Civita symbol matters. $$=(p+A)^2+\epsilon_{ijk}\partial^iA^j \sigma_k=(p+A)^2+(\nabla\times \vec A)\cdot\vec\sigma=(p+A)^2+\vec B\cdot\vec\sigma.$$


If you are wondering how they figured out $Q$ in the first place, I imagine they were aware of the identity $\vec{V}\cdot{\vec\sigma}\,\vec{V}\cdot{\vec\sigma}=V^2$, for an ordinary (non-operator) $\vec V$, so they just looked at the kinetic term and tried out an operator $Q=(\vec p+\vec A)\cdot \vec\sigma$. The maybe unexpected thing is this also gives you the magnetic field term with $g=2$.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...