Sunday 8 December 2019

quantum mechanics - Why must the eigenvalue of the number operator be an integer?


My apologies if this question has already been answered. Using the notation of Sakurai, we have an energy eigenket N and an eigenvalue n.


$$N | n \rangle = n | n \rangle$$


For the number operator $N = a^\dagger a $. My question is precisely why does n have to be an integer. I do understand that it must be positive definite due to the norm condition on $ a | n \rangle $:


$$\langle n | a^\dagger a | n \rangle \geq 0$$


I can see that we can show:


$$ a | n \rangle = \sqrt{n-1} | n-1 \rangle $$ and similarly for $a^\dagger | n \rangle$


Sakurai argues that the sequential operation of $a$ operators leads to the form which he does not write, but I will write here for clarity:


$$ a^k | n \rangle = \left(\sqrt{n}\sqrt{n-1}...\sqrt{n-k+1}\right) | n - k + 1 \rangle $$


Since



$$ a|0 \rangle = 0 $$


the sequence must terminate, but can only terminate if n is an integer. How can we make that jump? Is there a formal mathematical proof that the sequence $\left(\sqrt{n}\sqrt{n-1}...\sqrt{n-k+1}\right)$ will terminate if and only if n is an integer?



Answer





  1. Show that if $|\nu\rangle$ is an eigenvector of $N$ with eigenvalue $\nu$, and if $a|\nu\rangle\neq 0$, then $a|\nu\rangle$ is an eigenvector of $N$ with eigenvalue $\nu-1$.




  2. Convince yourself that the spectrum of the number operator is non-negative.





Assume, by way of contradiction, that there is some non-integer eigenvalue $\nu^*>0$ and let $m$ denote the smallest integer larger than $\nu^*$. Use property 1 repeatedly ($m$-times) to show that $a^m|\nu^*\rangle$ is an eigenvector of $N$ with eigenvalue $\nu^*-m <0$. This is a contradiction QED.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...