Friday, 17 April 2020

quantum field theory - Crossing Symmetry in Bhabha scattering and Moller scattering


Given the amplitude for a particular process, it may be possible to obtain the amplitude for another similar process by a so called crossing symmetry. I know there is a $s \leftrightarrow u$ crossing symmetry between the tree level diagrams appearing in Bhabha ($e^+ e^- \rightarrow e^+ e^-$) and Moller scattering ($e^- e^- \rightarrow e^- e^-)$ However, I am trying to understand how this is obtained. I put the relevant diagrams in the picture below.


enter image description here


What I have been trying to do is rotate the $s$ channel diagram appearing in Bhabha scattering (bottom right) to get a $t$ channel diagram with which I can relate to the $t$ channel diagram already appearing in the Moller scattering (top left). This would imply $p_1 \rightarrow p_1,\,\, p_2 \rightarrow -p_4, \,\,p_3 \rightarrow -p_2,\,\, p_4 \rightarrow p_3$ but this does not give the $s \leftrightarrow u$ sought after.



Thanks for any explanations!



Answer



Crossing symmetry tells you that you should not only exchange $$p_2\leftrightarrow -p_4$$ in the amputated matrix elements, but also replace the wavefunction polarizations $$ u^{\pm}(p_2)\rightarrow v^{\mp}(p_4) $$ (where the spin polarizations have been reversed), and finally multiply the amplitude for a factor $-1$ (Since you are crossing a fermionic pair).


All of this is equivalent to the simple $s\leftrightarrow u$ only for the forward scattering at $t=0$ or for the scattering averaged over all the polarizations.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...