Consider a field redefinition ϕ→ϕ′=ϕ+λϕ2
L0=−12(∂μϕ∂μϕ+m2ϕ2)⟹EOM: ◻ϕ−m2ϕ=0
Answer
I remember this as a nice problem from chapter 10 of Srenicki's QFT book. Your first expression for L′ should have factors of m2 in the last two terms. You should work with the lagrangian from here and derive the feynman rules and calculate the scattering amplitude. I will sketch this for you below. It is a very nice excercise to check whether you have understood everything up to that point.
You cannot use the EOM as you have done since that was for the original ϕ before the field redefinition. After the field redefinition your new ϕ (may help you to call it something else, e.g. ϕ→ψ+λψ2) has a different equation of motion involving quadratic and cubic terms!
As I said above you should just work from your first expression for L′ with the derivatives in and derive the Feynman rules from there. If you go through the whole procedure as is done in the previous chapter (being careful about the derivatives and symmetry factors) for each type of vertex (from each new term in the lagrangian) you will find a whole bunch of new vertex factors. Just calculate the 3 or 4 point function for each individual term and determine the feynman rules that way. Once you get used to how it works you can start to read them off directly from the lagrangian but it is good to go through the whole procedure a few times first. You should find for example, the cubic term with no derivatives gives a vertex joining three lines with a vertex factor of −i3!λm2.
So the total vertex joining three lines will just be the sum of these two. Do the same for the four point vertex and then as you say, draw all the feynman diagrams for ϕϕ→ϕϕ scattering, calculate the total amplitude and you should find if you do everything right that you get lots of nice cancellations and the answer is zero and you will have a nice warm feeling inside :-)
Derivative interactions such as these crop up in non-abelian gauge theories (e.g. the standard model) and gravity so they are important to understand. If you are still having trouble calculating the vertex factors I highly recommend this pdf which goes through in painstaking detail how to derive feynman rules. It follows the treatment by Srednicki too! Check section 5.3 and 5.4 for what you need.
No comments:
Post a Comment