As I understand it, the axion a originates from the spontaenous symmetry breaking of U(1)PQ. This symmetry being anomalous, and because of the QCD vacuum structure, a non vanishing term like afaTr(G˜G) is included in the Lagrangian, where G is the gluon field strenght. This determines the axion couplings to gluons. Talking about a coupling to photons would mean to consider a term like afaF˜F, where F is the QED field strenght. I thought a term like F˜F could be expressed as a vanishing total derivative, unlike Tr(G˜G), so why are we talking about axion couplings to photons ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid
What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...
-
At room temperature, play-dough is solid(ish). But if you make a thin strip it cannot just stand up on it's own, so is it still solid? O...
-
I have an hydrogenic atom, knowing that its ground-state wavefunction has the standard form ψ=Ae−βr with $A = \frac{\bet...
-
Sometimes I am born in silence, Other times, no. I am unseen, But I make my presence known. In time, I fade without a trace. I harm no one, ...
-
The gravitation formula says F=Gm1m2r2, so if the mass of a bob increases then the torque on it should also increase...
-
I want to know what happens to the space a black hole crosses over as our galaxy travels through space.
-
This image from NASA illustrates drag coefficients for several shapes: It is generally accepted that some variation of the teardrop/airfoil...
-
Small vessels generally lean into a turn, whereas big vessels lean out. Why do ships lean to the outside, but boats lean to the inside of a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment