How can I derive that →E=−→∇ϕ−∂→A∂t
where
ϕ is the scalar potential and
→A the vector potential?
Faraday's law: rot(→E)+˙→B=0
Source-less B-field:
div(→B)=0
From this in a simply connected domain there follows the existence of a vector potential
→A with
→B=rot→A
Therewith, Faraday's law reads
rot(→E+˙→A)=0
The curl-freeness of the vector field
→E+˙→A (in a simply connected domain) implies the existence of a scalar potential with
→E+˙→A=−gradφ
and that is your formula. You see
φ is
just defined in the way you wrote it down.
The purpose of introducing →A is to solve div→B=0 and the purpose of introducing φ is to solve Faraday's law. In most cases the only equation which remains to be solved is Ampre's law rot→H=→S+˙→D
which reads with our new independent variables
φ and
→A as
rot(μrot→A)=(κ+ε∂t)(−gradφ−˙→A).
Maybe, one has also a pre-defined space-charge density
ρ. That would imply the equation
ρ=div→D=div(ε(−gradφ−˙→A))
For constant
ε you have
−ρε=Δφ+div˙→A
Now, you have some degrees of freedom in the choice of
→A. If
→A is a vector potential for
→B then for any smooth scalar function
φ′ also
→A′:=→A+gradφ′ is a vector potential for
→B since
rotgrad=0. One possible choice is
div→A=0. Therewith, the equation for the space charge reads just
−ρε=Δφ
which we know from electro-statics. The nice thing of
div→A=0 is that the above equation decouples from the magnetics. (But only if
ρ assumed to be predefined.) So one can solve the problem staggered.
The condition div→A=0 can always be satisfied. If we initially have a vector potential →A′ with div→A′≠0 then we define →A:=→A′+gradφ′ such that 0=div→A=div(→A′+gradφ′)=div→A′+Δφ′
To find the function
φ′ for the modification of
→A′ we just have to solve the poisson equation
Δφ′=−div→A′
for
φ′. The coice
divA=0 is the so called Coulomb gauging.
A field is determined by its curl and sources. Under the assumption that we have already the required boundary conditions for φ and →A then the fixation of the divergence for the vector potential (i.e., the gauging) determines the potentials uniquely. Beside the Coulomb gauging there are other forms of useful gauging (e.g., Lorentz-gauging).
No comments:
Post a Comment