Should theory be the appropriate term? I mean, for example, because of the quantum field theory we have been able to find the subatomic particles that it theorized and make the Standard Model. Why then is is labeled as a theory? Also wave-particle duality is widely accepted fact yet labeled as a theory. What is up with that, why call it a theory. Maybe because it promotes the fact of idealism?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I have an hydrogenic atom, knowing that its ground-state wavefunction has the standard form $$ \psi = A e^{-\beta r} $$ with $A = \frac{\bet...
-
At room temperature, play-dough is solid(ish). But if you make a thin strip it cannot just stand up on it's own, so is it still solid? O...
-
Sometimes I am born in silence, Other times, no. I am unseen, But I make my presence known. In time, I fade without a trace. I harm no one, ...
-
This image from NASA illustrates drag coefficients for several shapes: It is generally accepted that some variation of the teardrop/airfoil...
-
I want to know what happens to the space a black hole crosses over as our galaxy travels through space.
-
Sorry if this question is a bit broad but I can't find any info on this by just searching. The equation q = neAL where L is the length o...
-
I am making a simple little program that needs to simulate a physics concept. However, I am not exactly sure how the physics concept actuall...
No comments:
Post a Comment