Let's take the two cycles in the pictures working with an ideal gas. We perform one, and then perform the other. The cycle is made reversible by making the gas exchange heat with a heat bath having the same temperature. Since this is a simple system, it has only two independent state variables, e.g. p and V, so the entropy of the system should return to the same value in both processes, only the entropy of the environment will be different. My questions are:
- How do I calculate the total entropy change in case of the irreversible process? Since ∮δQ/T is less than zero, and the entropy change of the system is zero, the entropy change of the environment is greater than zero, ∮δQ/T can't be the entropy change of either. For this I would need to calculate δQrev, but I can't think of any reason why it should be different from δQirrev. This is rather problematic, since we usually cheat by making a process reversible this way.
- What is the physical meaning of δQT in case of the irreversible process?
- Does the entropy change in Clausius' inequality δQT≤dS belong only to the system, or the system+environment? I suspect that it belongs to the system+environment combination, but then there is a little problem. Sometimes some people prove ∮δQirrev/T<0 by taking the integral of both sides of Clausius' inequality along a closed path: ∮δQirrev/T<∮dS=0. But if dS belongs to the whole universe, then integrating along an irreversible process may be a closed path for the system, but it can't be a closed path for the whole universe. This is because the difference between a reversible and an irreversible cycle is that they take the environment into different states, despite taking the system back to the same state. Thus this way of proving ∮δQirrev/T<0 is false. (Nevertheless I know it can be proven in another way.)
UPDATE: From the answer I realized that I have overlooked something in the calculation of the entropy change of the left (irreversible) cycle, and the integral over the cycle gives 0, because −nRlnT1T3T2T4=0 not to mention I have miscalculated the sign (although it doesn't make a difference because it evaluates to zero.) The expression being zero can be seen by noting that Gay-Lussac's laws connect the temperatures: pT1=p+ΔpT2
Answer
Answering your questions
(1) As long as the irreversibility arises solely as a consequence of the fact that the system and the environment are at different temperatures, the methods outlined below work. You can calculate ΔSsys as normal, and calculating ΔSenv is also straight-forward if we treat its temperature as constant. There is no such thing as δQrev and δQirr. The difference between the reversible and irreversible cases is the path that the environment takes through state space.
(2) This depends on what δQ and what T you're talking about. If Q is the heat flow into the system, and T is the temperature of the system, then this is dSsys=δQsys/Tsys. If these are the heat flow into the environment and the temperature of the reservoir, then this is dSenv=δQenv/Tenv. If Q is the heat flow into the system and T is the temperature of the environment, then δQsys/Tenv is just −dSenv, and we can interpret the quantity dσ=dSsys−δQsys/Tenv as the entropy production of this part of the process. In the case where the irreversibility arises solely as a consequence of heat flow between system and environment when they have different temperatures, and if the system operates on a quasi-static cycle, then the net entropy production σ=∮dσ goes into the environment.
(3) Let's write the Clausius' inequality carefully as δQsysTenv<dSsys.
Now, I think it's worth expanding on these comments:
Preliminaries
(A) If we are talking about the system following the cycle shown above, there is no such thing as δQrev vs δQirr. The reason is that in order to even draw that diagram to begin with, we are assuming that the system is undergoing quasi-static processes. The irreversibility is solely a product of the energy exchange with the environment. In particular, it is due to heat flow between the system and its environment when the there is a finite temperature difference between them.
(B) The Clausius' inequality is subtle. The temperature that shows up in δQ/T is the temperature of the boundary of the system, not the system itself! In other words, T appearing in the Clausius' inequality is actually the temperature of the environment. This is why during an irreversible process, the entropy change of the system, defined by ∮δQsys/Tsys, can be zero, while ∮δQsys/Tres<0.
In any case, it is useful to do some calculations explicitly. Let's concentrate on the isochoric process 1→2 for the purposes of illustration.
Heuristics
Below, we carefully compute the entropy changes for both system and environment, but for now, let's give a quick heuristic explanation of what's going on.
If---as illustrated in the figures above---the system undergoes a quasi-static process (meaning that the system moves through a sequence of equilibrium states and so always has a well-defined set of thermodynamic variables), then the entropy change of the system is given by integrating δQsys/Tsys from point 1 to 2 along a reversible path, regardless of whether the actual process is reversible or not. If the process is not quasi-static for the system, it is possible that the system can be broken up into subsystems that do undergo quasi-static processes.
In general, one can calculate the entropy change during an irreversible process between two equilibrium states by imagining a quasi-static process between them and calculating ΔS for that process. If the process is quasi-static, we can use dS=δQ/T. If not, we can use the thermodynamic relation
dU=TdS−pdV+μdN
by solving for dS and integrating along the reversible path.
Here, we assume that the irreversibility arises solely as a consequence of heat exchange between the system and its environment while they are different temperatures, which means that the system and environment each undergo separate quasi-static processes, but we can think of them as two subsystems comprising a closed system that does not undergo a quasi-static process.
We do a sample calculation carefully below, but note that Tsys is changing throughout the process. On the other hand, the entropy change of the environment is given by integrating δQenv/Tenv along a reversible path, where these are now quantities associated with the environment.
Now, consider the case where the system is in contact with a single reservoir of temperature T2 throughout this process, which means that at all times, Tenv>Tsys. In any small part of the process, the heat flow out of the reservoir is equal to the heat flow into the system, and so the entropy gain of the system is necessarily larger than the entropy loss of the reservoir: dSsys=δQsysTsys>δQsysTres=−δQresTres=−dSres
Finally, if we were to calculate part of the Clausius' inequality integral, it would be exactly δQsysTres=−dSres<dSsys
Careful calculation
The entropy change of the system is given by ΔSsys,1→2=∫21δQsysT=∫T2T1nCVdTT,
Now, suppose that this process comes about due to the system being in contact with a thermal reservoir of constant temperature T2. Then, the change in entropy of the reservoir is given by ΔSres,1→2=∫21δQresTres=∫21−δQsysT2,
The piece of the Clausius' inequality here is then just ∫21δQsysTres=Q1→2T2<Q1→2ln(T2/T1)T2−T1=ΔSsys,1→2.
No comments:
Post a Comment