Tuesday, 26 September 2017

symmetry - Which transformations *aren't* symmetries of a Lagrangian?


As far as I understand, Noether's theorem for fields works, as explained in David Tong's QFT lecture notes (page 14) for example, by saying that a transformation $\phi(x) \mapsto \phi(x) + \delta \phi (x)$ is called a symmetry if it produces a change in the Lagrangian density which can be expressed as a four divergence, $$\delta \mathcal{L} = \partial_{\mu} F^{\mu}\tag{1.35} $$ for some 4-vector field $F^{\mu}$.


We thengo onto show that the change in this Lagrangian density may also be expressed for an arbitrary transformation as


$$\delta \mathcal{L} = \partial_{\mu}\bigg(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu} \phi)}\delta \phi\bigg)\tag{1.37}.$$


Which is a 4-divergence. So how could we say any transformation is not a symmetry in the sense above?



Answer



The point is that eq. (1.35) should hold off-shell to have a symmetry, while eq. (1.37) may only hold on-shell.


[The term on-shell (in this context) means that the Euler-Lagrange equations are satisfied. See also this Phys.SE post.]


In other words: On-shell, the action will only change with at most a boundary term for any infinitesimal variation, whether or not it is a symmetry.



Phrased differently: By a symmetry is meant an off-shell symmetry. An on-shell symmetry is a vacuous notion.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...