As far as I understand, Noether's theorem for fields works, as explained in David Tong's QFT lecture notes (page 14) for example, by saying that a transformation ϕ(x)↦ϕ(x)+δϕ(x) is called a symmetry if it produces a change in the Lagrangian density which can be expressed as a four divergence, δL=∂μFμ
We thengo onto show that the change in this Lagrangian density may also be expressed for an arbitrary transformation as
δL=∂μ(∂L∂(∂μϕ)δϕ).
Which is a 4-divergence. So how could we say any transformation is not a symmetry in the sense above?
Answer
The point is that eq. (1.35) should hold off-shell to have a symmetry, while eq. (1.37) may only hold on-shell.
[The term on-shell (in this context) means that the Euler-Lagrange equations are satisfied. See also this Phys.SE post.]
In other words: On-shell, the action will only change with at most a boundary term for any infinitesimal variation, whether or not it is a symmetry.
Phrased differently: By a symmetry is meant an off-shell symmetry. An on-shell symmetry is a vacuous notion.
No comments:
Post a Comment