Kirchhoff's current law assumes "that whenever current flows into one end of a conductor it immediately flows out the other end".
I want to understand what happens when we cannot make this assumption.
In the circuit below, imagine that S1 has been open (disconnected) for a long time. At a time t=0 the switch is instantaneously closed. If we assume that the LEDs have instantaneous switching time, at what time t will D1 and D2 emit light?
Do the LEDs begin to emit light simultaneously? Do they emit light after 3 light-seconds, 1.5 light-seconds, or some other time?
My guess is that D1 will emit light at t=1s and D2 will emit at t=3s. It should be impossible for D1 to emit light when t<1s and for D2 to emit light when t<3s. If this were not the case then this would result in superluminal communication, which violates causality.
What happens when a second switch S2 is introduced to the circuit below? Imagine that both switches have been open for a long time. At time t=0 both S1 and S2 are simultaneously closed.
At what time t do the LEDs emit light? What changes compared to first circuit?
Assumptions:
- The LEDs and switches are placed in close proximity to each other, although the length of the wires separating them may be very long. For example, S1 and D1 are separated by a 1 light-second length of wire, however, we assume that they are physically placed close together relative to a human observer looking at the circuit. Only the electrical paths have significant propagation times.
- The electric field propagates through the circuit at c
- All circuit elements are ideal
- Switches and LEDs have instantaneous switching time
- When a switch is open, it is physically disconnected from the circuit.
- There are no parasitic resistances, capacitances, or inductances
No comments:
Post a Comment