Friday, 12 August 2016

Charged quantum particle in a magnetic field - choosing a different gauge leads to different wavefunctions


Consider a charged quantum particle confined to the $xy$ plane, subject to a magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{z}$.
The Hamiltonian is:


$$ H = \frac{1}{2m} \left( \mathbf{p} - \frac{e \mathbf{A}}{c}\right)^2~, $$


where $\mathbf{A}$ is the vector potential, for which we have a freedom of gauge in choosing. One possible choice is $\mathbf{A} = B x \hat{y}$, which leads to the Hamiltonian:


$$ H = \frac{1}{2m} \left[ p_x^2 + \left(p_y- m \omega_c x\right)^2\right],$$


where $\omega_c = eB/mc$ is the cyclotron frequency. Following the usual derivation of Landau quantization, we get the wavefunctions:


$$ \psi(x,y) = f_n ( x- k_y / m \omega_c ) e^{i k_y y},$$


where $f_n$ are the eigenfunctions of the simple harmonic oscillator ($n=0,1,2...$).


However, we can also choose $\mathbf{A} = -B y \hat{x}$, which following the same lines would lead to the wavefunctions:



$$ \psi(x,y) = f_n ( y+ k_x / m \omega_c ) e^{i k_x x}.$$


The two outcomes seems different by more then just a global phase, yet all we did was use our freedom in picking a gauge.
How does this work out?



Answer




yet all we did was use our freedom in picking a gauge.



No, you did another thing: choosing the complete set of commuting observables. In the first case you choose $\left\{H,p_y\right\}$ and the second $\left\{H,p_x\right\}$. The difference in operators ($p_x$ vs $p_y$) leads to difference in eigenvectors.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding Stagnation point in pitot fluid

What is stagnation point in fluid mechanics. At the open end of the pitot tube the velocity of the fluid becomes zero.But that should result...